Monday, June 10, 2019

Emerging Markets: BP, AAR, and TNK-BP (Case Analysis) Global Business Strategy Mike W. Peng


Introduction

A strategic alliance is done by the firm to explore the international resources and there is a various way to do so. According to Peng (2013), "Some of those reasons include, looking for new customers, raw materials, cheap labor, other monitory and fiscal benefits such as lower taxes, lower energy prices, host country subsidies".

BP, a western firm, has done Joint Venture (JV) with the Russian consortiums namely TNK-BP to start the business in Russia to explore oil fields of Russia and Ukraine to make it world's 3rd largest oil producer. It is better for a firm to align with local firms and not to wholly owned business while doing business outside the home country. Every country has its own rules and regulation regarding an alliance with a foreign nation country and its compulsory for any businesses coming to Russia to have local partners. By following the industry, resource, and institution-based strategy any firm can create a strong strategy to sustain in the foreign market. BP and its strategic partners have clear miscommunication and trust between them as we can see in both episodes. BP has been trying to explore more business outside Russia in the first episode and its strategic partner AAR has denied on so. And in the second episode, BP has clearly breached the agreement in JV to have third alliance by any of the members in JV.











Discussion

1. From and industry-based view, explain why alliances are a frequent mode of entry for the oil industry in Russia.

A strategic alliance is one of the most efficient modes of entering the foreign market and the industry-based view helps to examine the competitive advantages and external forces that the industry can survive in the external environment. The industry-based view helps the industry to measure its opportunities and threats in the external environment. The joint venture between BP and AAR to form TNK-BP has been very advantageous to scale up in the oil and gas industry.

The Russian government rules and regulation is not suitable to for any foreign investors to establish wholly-owned organization so it makes best to have strategic alliances with the local firms as BP has done by doing JV with AAR. The Russian Government encourages foreign investors to align with the local firms. The rules and regulations in either host or home country can change at any time so it is the best option logically and safest to collaborate with local firms as of industry-based view.



2. From a resource-based view, what are the complementary resources and capabilities both sides brought to TNK-BP?

 The resource-based view helps an organization to evaluate its capabilities and limitations and helps in making the decision to groom its strength. TNK is a combination of three Russian firms and BP a foreign firm. The Russian consortium is very much aware of the political and legal situation within Russia, and they know how to operate according to the bureaucracy. BP has strong technical knowledge for extracting the resources (gas and oil) and properly distribute. So the combination of these companies together as a strategic alliance will benefit mutually.



3. From an institution-based view, what are the formal and informal rules of the game governing this industry in Russia?

The institution-based view suggests that the organization should consider country, state, and societal factors to have wider influences. BP announced to have a strategic partnership with state-owned Rosneft to explore new offshore oil field on the Russian Arctic continental shelf in the Kara Sea. AAR refused that BP could not ally as per the TNK-BP Joint Venture agreement so BP has to pull back the alliance with Rosneft.

BP finally aligned with the Russian government and Rosneft and furthermore for adding up in the frustration of BP, its strategic alliance Rosneft aligned with Exxon Mobil to explore the Arctic Kara Sea.



4. ON ETHICS: As an ethics consultant to BP, how would you advise it during both episodes of the conflicts with AAR?

An organization should follow business practices, ethics, and norms as of industry-based view while entering into alliances in a foreign country. In the first episode, BP was eager to extend the JV to Cuba, Syria, and Iran and AAR were not ready for it. And in the second episode, we can see BP clearly violated the JV agreement of doing business in Russia with other firms.

As an ethics consultant to BP, they should respect the agreement and follow it in an ethical way. They should communicate with its alliance while pursuing further business, expanding management, and employee benefit in the same region though they could have profited financially by doing independently.



5. ON ETHICS: If you were an arbitrator in Stockholm, Sweden, which side would you support in both episodes?

In the first episode, due to lack of proper communications between BP and its Russian alliances for spreading the business in Syria, Cuba, and Iran, the deal was not forwarded. BP being a western based firm has to comply with the legal formalities of the host nation. So both the parties should have communicated properly and sorted out differences.

In the second episode, we can see that BP has been a failure in extending its alliances with other firms in Russia. BP was going to an alliance with the competitor of TNK-BP with which it has a JV. As a business, it is most to work for the partner's interest and best-practices. It is clearly BP's fault to break down the agreement and work outside the contract.







Conclusion

The strategic alliance was formed between BP and TNK by creating joint venture TNK-BP to explore oil reserves in Russia and Ukraine by making JV the third largest oil company in the world. The lack of proper communication and trust between alliances let down the alliance to go for legal action. The interference of the Russian government and the realization of BP that the failure was ahead if the agreement was violated helped BP to regain business in Russia.

























References

Peng, Mark W. (2013). Business Strategy, Business-level Strategies. Retrieved May 13, 2019, from


Unknown. (2012, November 8). AAR consortium says agreed with BP on TNK-BP board. Retrieved May 13, 2019, from


Rammandala Charm. (2016, November 6). A Study to Explore the International Business Strategy using TNK-BP Strategic Alliance as a Case Study. Retrieved May 13, 2019, from